Got a question about hippies, drugs, love, or whatever?
The Old Hippy will try to answer.
The Old Hippy regrets he can't answer everyone's questions.
Click here to ask a
question, or write to oldhippy@hippy.com.
Thanks for the great response to Ask the Old Hippy.
The most recent questions and answers are below.
To view previous
questions and answers click here!
All artwork and content copyright 1999, Hip
Inc.
my dear friend is a Communist. a 'marxist
idealist' she calls herself. we often have debates going on the matter;
she was telling me that one of the policies of the Communist system is
to discourage and get rid of all cultural and religious differences. this
is done with the intent that it will create a higher level of peace between
the many different peoples of the world if they have no such differences
between them; wars over religion, culture and race will cease to be. i
argue that although this may be true to a certain extent, religion and
culture are too great a price to sacrifice. she asks me what kind of a
hippie i am, that i would not consent to this for the sake of world peace?
but i could not give this up, even for the sake of more peace. what would
this world be without its differences?
thanks a lot for the time!
love,
--carolyn
This is a good involved question. In theory, the
communist utopia envisioned by Karl Marx was a vast improvement over the
impoverished conditions prevelant in the industrialized world in the early
1900's. Indeed in Russia and China, the systems that existed prior
to communism were very exploitive of the people.
The problem lies in the practice of communism because
failable humans must setup the system and enforce it. The one thing
that communism neglects to address is some of the most basic human traits
including GREED (Capitalism certainly takes it into account). What
happens is those who attain power within the system get corrupted - this
is the truism; "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely".
In all the communists systems that have appeared on the planet, each has
had an all powerful dictator to run it. So that means one person,
and one person alone gets to decide what is best for the millions of people
living in the system. And since that one person is corrupted absolutely,
everyone has to bow to that person's vision, whether they like it or not!
And the usual penalty for opposition is either exile or death.
To make the communist system work, they must eliminate
cultural, ethnic and religious differences. We see how it's done
today in Kosovo (Milosovich learned well as a communist). It's been
done in similar fashion in Russia and China. Not a very good system,
in my opinion.
Hippies rejoice in our differences. We
respect and celebrate diversity, it's what makes life interesting.
Imagine if you went traveling, and everywhere it was the same. The
same dreary buildings, the same slogans on banners, the same language,
the same mentality, the same laws, the same music for god's sake!
This is life under communism (yes I know capitalism puts McDonalds everywhere,
but at least in France it's not a big mac, its a Royale). Is this
what we want our lives to be? If this is the price of peace, I agree,
it's far too high.
Once upon a time, the communist system in it's idealized
form was an improvement. But now that we've seen it's limitations,
we can bid it farewell. What we need is a new, better system, one
that takes into account human nature, especially the need for self-actualization.
This system should encourage individuals to expand their minds and talents.
We have yet to do better than the ancient Greeks who gave us the radical
form of government called democracy.
Now that technology has enabled us to all communicate
efficiently, to be well informed, and to easily express ourselves we have
available the means to achieve something far greater than ever before.
We need only to organize this into a self-governing system, one that will
totally replace the existing one. It's already beginning, our only
obstacle is removing from power those who place such a high value on it
(power). I hope it will be an evolution, not a revolution, that will
accomplish these goals.
In the meantime, wars over political, racial,
ethnic, and religious differences will occur, perhaps even more frequently!
It's totally "natural" to remove competing genetic material, whether you're
human or bacteria (sometimes it's hard to tell the difference). That's
the bottom line. Each person protects his own DNA, first starting
with himself, his family, his extended family, the group he identifies
with, his ethnic, or religious group, then his nation. It's completely
instinctual.
What we need to do then, on an individual basis,
one person at a time, is come to an understanding that our entire race
is facing a mass extinction if we don't change our attitudes. "Isms"
and differences between people only keep us apart if we let them.
We must get beyond our FEARS or genetic bias, and realize that we are all
the same. We need to recognize our common inheritance, this planet,
as being a sacred place and start showing it some respect (Communists seem
unable to do this).
I believe it is possible for people to get
beyond their differences and to display a higher morality that respects
all life. All it takes is a good example for people to see how easy
it is to live in peace and harmony. All it takes is a hippy.
-The Old Hippy
Old Hippy-
Hi. This letter is not concerning drugs, flower
power, or whatnot; I
had a very important question about Vietnam.
Back in the sixties, when many
of our American citizens where fighting for freedom,
people at home were
getting loaded shouting, "Make love not war".
Well, it was easier said than
done. Did anyone listen to our antiwar suggestions?
No. Our men were
getting hopeless because they were out risking
there lives, and they didn't
have any support. Even our own president Bill
Clinton ran to Canada, so he
wouldn't have to get drafted. My question is,
why did this happen? What did
the guys that fought for Vietnam think of this?
And what good did the hippies
do for humanity-other than get others explore
their minds, and discover
themselves? I don't know much about Vietnam,
so if you can't answer my
questions, it's okay; I would like to hear what
you know. Thank you for your
time!!
-Generation X
Let's set the record straight (if this is possible). You state that
the
boys in Vietnam "were fighting for freedom". I ask you back - Whose
freedom? We were supposedly a free country then (as we are supposed
to be
now). Vietnam was no immediate threat to any American. So they certainly
weren't fighting for our freedom. It was a situation similar to Kosovo,
but
without the ethnic cleansing, which is our only justification for being
involved in that fiasco.
So if the young men sent to Vietnam to die, were sent to free the Vietnamese
people, what exactly were they being freed from? Yes, the North was
communist and wanted to take over the South, which was capitalist.
Communism might be a less efficient system than Capitalism, but is the
difference worth dying for? Were we justified in killing people because
we have a better system??? Does might make us right?
The truth is that it was US business interests that got us into the
war and kept us there.
After the first few years of the war, the war itself became big business!
American corporations and investors were getting rich as the government
plowed every extra dollar into the war effort, at the expense of the
social programs
of Johnson's Great Society.
It's amazing to me that you think that no one listened to the antiwar
effort. Not only did people listen, they got involved, even veterans
returning from Vietnam! We mobilized millions of people in the effort.
Although it took time, it did work! The big turnaround came when Lyndon
Johnson decided not to run for office again. His whole Vietnam policy
was a
failure and he knew it. He was faced with running against the antiwar
candidates (just about all the other democrats) and instead decided
to retire. If
the democrats had won that election, the war would have been over much
sooner. Instead Tricky Dick got elected, and with the whole
military/industrial complex supporting him, continued the war for many
more
years. That's politics!
From the 1968 elections onward, the antiwar movement continued, but
the opposition (read:
government) got violent. Witness Chicago during the Democratic Convention.
Kent State where 4 students were murdered by the National Guard. The
war
came home, and we were lying bloodied and dying in the streets. And
you
think we did nothing! It really makes me wonder what they are teaching
you
in the schools these days? Have they rewritten history?
We have all learned some lessons about Vietnam. Why do you think we
haven't
sent in ground troops in Kosovo. That's because the government is afraid
of
public opinion! Before Vietnam most people supported whatever the
government's foreign policy was at the moment. Young men were eager
to
sign up to fight overseas. With the hippy and antiwar
movements we learned to "question authority". Before no one would think
to
second guess our political and military leaders. After all they had
successfully guided us through WW II and the Korean wars where we were
victorious. A better question for you to ask is "Why did we go to Vietnam
and what did we accomplish there?" We need the answer because maybe
then we
can figure out what the hell we're doing in Kosovo!
What blows my mind is the concept of sovereignity. This means
that every
government respects the rights of other governments to do whatever
they
want to the people inside their borders with impunity. Even though
the leader
of a country can be a complete lunatic, we must respect that person
and his
government's right to exist. The ludicrious irony of this situation
will come to
a head when the US and Nato are forced to negotiate with the mass murderer
Milosovich over the future of Kosovo.
To me the real lesson is not to trust any government. They exist to
serve
the rich and powerful in every country, including this one. A government
will defend itself against it's own people whether justified or not.
When a
government kills it's own people without valid reason (like Kent State
or
Kosovo - take your pick) it loses any credibility it has as a representative
of the people. So the real problem is the nature of government itself.
We
need to either re-invent government as a tool of the people, using
the
empowering new technology at our disposal, or continue being cannon
fodder for those special interests that our government owes favors
to.
The revolution that was never finished must become the evolution that
leads us
to a new beginning.
-The Old Hippy
I was wondering how you feel about the ' 99 reunion
of Woodstock. It seems
to me that they (whoever "they" are) are
just out for money, just like
everyone eles. Even if they had some of
the originals to play, they would
never be able to capture the feeling of
the original woodstock.
I do think that it is unethical to capitalize on the success of a previous
event if it has nothing in common with it. Woodstock '69 was the original
Woodstock and everything else is just imitation. This new event is
nowhere
near the original location. It doesn't have any of the originals playing
(so far). I don't get the connection.
Nevertheless it sounds like a good concert, and if enough people show
up
with the right attitude it might capture some of the original's spirit,
but
that would be where the similarity would end. I'm all for reviving
the
spirit of Woodstock, but that was an event that happened in another
time and
space and was sort of a watershed in the hippy movement. I really doubt
that anything could duplicate the feeling or the experience, marketing
hype
notwithstanding.
I'd be more impressed by a new event, which billed itself as something
unique, that actually was able to bring people together in peace and
harmony. The closest thing happening to that this year is The Eclipse
Festival http://www.solipse.com
on August 9-15, 1999 at Ozora, Hungary, near
Budapest.
Anyway if you're interested in Woodstock '99, check out:
http://members.AOL.com/Mary1NYS/Woodstock.html
for more info!
-The Old Hippy
Dear Old Hippy,
I was a vegetarian, and practically vegan, for
almost 6 years. During
this time, my health deteriorated rapidly, and
I was in the hospital
many, many times. I even was pronounced dead
for nearly one minute, the
last time around. My illness started when I got
Epstein-Barr virus
followed by the resulting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
I already had
asthma, which became the large Achilles Heel
after I got the virus. I
had become vegetarian because it seemed that
eating meat would drag me
down. I would sleep for 3 hours after eating
a taco, or chicken
burrito!
I was recently allergy tested, and found that
I am allergic to beef,
shellfish, and chicken.
Then I came across the Eat Right For Your (blood)
Type diet, (by Dr.
Peter D'Adamo). He and his father have found
that only Blood Type A's
should be vegetarians! Type O's can die if they
don't eat meat, and
wheat can actually attack a Type O's heart! I
am a Type AB, the rarest
form of blood, and newest (only 1000 years old!).
I have been on the
diet for about a month, and am trying hard to
eat the meat that he
recommends for my blood type: lamb, turkey and
albacore tuna.
I find it is harder on me emotionally, because
I want to remain
vegetarian, but I am in poor health. When I have
recently eaten the
meat, my body feels much better. I think this
diet can help me to
greatly improve my health, and especially increase
my fertility. We have
been trying for almost 10 months, without luck.
I want to have one
child with my husband (we are newlyweds. I am
30, he is 42), and want
to raise her to be a true hippy-- a person who
puts love, compassion and
peace above all else.
Every time I eat meat, I say a prayer to the animal's
soul, thanking it
for its sacrifice that I may live healthier.
I also thank the Great
Spirit for the knowledge I have gained by finding
this book that may
help me. I also only eat 4-6 ounces of meat 3
times a week. I don't
over do it, and I don't take more than what my
body needs.
My husband was vegetarian for 20 years also, and
he found out he has to
eat beef, buffalo, and venison to get healthier.
This has been hard on
him as well. However, his health (and possibly
fertility) is also
improving.
We eat animals that were raised on organic meals
only, in the right way
(even cage free range free eggs). We don't buy
from the evil cattle
rancher establishments, but from smaller farms
where the cows were
raised healthier, with room to run, and don't
get hormonal injections,
or antibiotics, etc.
My biggest question and concern is: How do I get
over judging myself on
this issue? I have advocated vegetarianism for
years! How can I be a
hippy if I eat meat? (I suppose it is the same
as taking drugs, it
isn't a requirement, but it helps!) How can I
live another day to
protest the establishment and promote love and
peace, if I am not eating
the right things to promote my own health? Isn't
it more important that
I eat meat responsibly, get healthier, and stay
alive to enjoy life, and
be a hippy in other ways? Also, isn't it true
that we are all just made
up of atoms? Animals, flowers, vegetables, the
air we breathe, is just
made up of the same stuff, the same particles,
the mind-stuff of our
creator, the Divine Mother of all life. Since
this is true, could there
be another spiritual way to look at eating meat?
Also, maybe it is the
animal's karma to be eaten. Maybe in the cosmic
scheme, an animal has
to sacrifice itself now so that it may evolve
and advance spiritually
later? Maybe we are helping the animal if we
have the right mindset?
If you can offer me some wisdom, Dear Old Hippy,
and perhaps some
consolation, I would be very grateful.
Also, do you know of a natural way to increase
fertility in men and
women? Children are so precious, and we want
one very much!
Thank you very much for your wisdom and advice.
Peace,
A. Fox
deepsleep@slip.net
I applaud the degree of consciousness with which you are making your
food
choices. We all need to be aware of the consequences of our decisions
be
they what to eat or how to live. Each of us has an impact upon what
happens
on this planet. As we mature we take more responsibility for our actions.
This leads us to the state you're in now, a moral dilemma.
I'm not familiar with this diet you're on. It sounds just like another
fad
diet. I must say the biggest problem I've found with vegetarians (I
know a lot of them) is that some of them don't eat right. That is they
favor certain vegetables over everything else and don't get enough
protein.
That could be your underlying problem and why you feel "good" when
you eat
one of the meat items recommended.
If what was said in that book were true, then I guess all those vegetarians
in India (almost half the population I believe), and in Asia should
really
be sick! In fact most are far healthier than Americans who eat meat
daily,
especially those who favor fast food. They are healthier despite the
lack
of refrigeration, lack of money for medical care, etc, etc. They are
also
healthier because their lives require them to do a lot of physical
labor.
Our couch potato society has turned us all soft and now we get "diseases"
like Epstein Barr and CFS. I use parenthesis since CFS has still to
be
proven to have a specific vector that causes it. No offense, as I don't
know your particular situation. Perhaps you get lots of physical activity,
but not enough protein.
I admire your determination to find an ethical reason to eat meat, despite
the pleadings of your conscience. However I don't think you need to
go to
such extremes to justify your actions. As a good friend of mine says
"It's
just light going into light". That certainly is one way of looking
at it.
Of course that friend had excellent health for the many years he was
a
vegetarian. Then he started eating meat and immediately took sick and
has
been sick on and off in the years since and continues to eat meat.
I too had the best health ever when I was a vegan. I only stopped because
I
went traveling and it became difficult to find the protein sources
I was
used to. The best sources for protein for vegetarians are the combination
of legumes and grains which form the complete amino acid chains (like
beans
and rice together), Tofu and TVP (texturized vegetable protein from
soybeans), and
dairy products like milk, cheese and yogurt. Some vegetarians eat eggs
as
well.
The other real important health tip I have is to take megadoses of vitamins
B complex and C. Together these help you when you get stressed. CFS
seems
like a disease where your body is similar to a stressed state where
all your
vitamins are depleted. If you haven't tried the vitamin therapy, give
it a
try. I'm just guessing and I know a lot of research has been done in
this
field without success, which leads me to believe they're looking in
the
wrong places for the answers.
By the way, I am a type "O", and was never sick during the seven years
when
I was a vegetarian and took megadoses of those vitamins (not even a
cold -unless I forgot to take the vitamins and got stressed).
If you've already tried what I recommend above, then I suggest you vary
your
diet, and if tuna and chicken makes you feel better (physically), then
go
for it. I'd avoid the lamb however. Fish is a relatively healthy protein
source without hormones (although tuna does have mercury). Chickens
can be
OK if they're free range, and not produced in a factory (but you know
this).
The only way I know to increase fertility reliably is to increase one's
level of physical activity. Of course if a person's lifestyle includes
things that decrease fertility they should stop doing those things
(like
drinking and smoking). In other words whatever makes you healthier
usually
makes you more fertile.
I wish you the best in your endeavor to get well consciously and to
conceive
a baby.
Peace,
The Old Hippy
Dear old Hippy,
I feel Marijuana is my spiritual food. I discovered
Marijuana's
spiritual benefits in 1994 at age 22. It opened
my mind up to deep ideas
about the world, God, and love of the earth and
humankind. All these ideas
flowed with euphoria, as I grooved to great music,
which MJ enhanced much
greater! A couple of years ago I began to study
books on different kind of
drugs (their chemistry, effects, ect.). After
studying PCP, I found that it can
be laced into Marijuana, and this frightened
me. Continuing to smoke MJ, I
was able to control this fear thinking it was
a one in a million chance it
could happen to me ( that my MJ would be laced
with PCP). About a year ago my
fear worsened when my friend (who smokes quite
often), told me he smoked a
joint one night which dissociated him from his
body and he saw angels,
demons, and other terrifying things. even though
he was told "Be careful with
this joint," when it was given to him, he smoked
it with his friend anyway.
Lately, I have been afraid to try Marijuana thinking
this may happen to me.
Over the past few months I have tried meditation,
and just positive thinking
to try and stop this compulsive fear, yet it
continues. I long to smoke again
because I feel a strong spiritual need for it.
If I did smoke a joint with a
friend, and it was laced with PCP, after taking
a hit or two (if it were
laced) would I notice the difference, so I could
stop smoking it right away?
Would a few hits of a laced joint be enough to
trigger a strong pcp trip where I would be dissociated, hallucinate, etc...?
Is there a way I can continue to smoke grass (which is always black market
obtained) and feel comfortable that I can detect PCP before I take to many
hits. Please help me
with any other advice you can give. This is a
strong fear of mine. I have
been using hypnosis to try and find the source
of this deep fear, it compares
to death were I am removed from my surroundings
and my body (very scary).
Yet, I can't go on allowing this to rob me of
something that I feel is part
of my religion (Marijuana). This may seem like
a stupid question and it's
embarrassing to me, nevertheless, I feel compelled
(after about 1 year of
worrying over this) to finally get some advice.
With Peace,
Billy
You do have a problem, Billy. Your paranoia probably stems from the
deep lying
guilt you have at breaking the law. This paranoia is completely irrational.
Few people if any bother to lace a joint with PCP. PCP is usually snorted
like cocaine. How many people put cocaine in a joint??? It's a waste.
The
only thing usually mixed in a joint is tobacco and that usually happens
in
Europe.
What I don't understand is if you're so concerned why don't you just
roll
your own joints! If someone gives you one and you're suspicious, you
can
just tear it open, look at it and roll it up in a new paper. Is that
so
hard? If you don't know what to look for, PCP is a white powder. It
would
fall away from the cannabis. Of course really good cannabis does have
white
resin on it, but careful examination would reveal that this is sticky
stuff
not powder.
PCP does take a little while to come on, so if you did smoke some you
might
not know it before you finish the joint. PCP is a very potent drug.
It has
been used as animal tranquilizer (like for horses and elephants - the
big
ones). So very little can get you very high. I suppose that street
dealers
might think about cutting some inferior grass with some PCP to make
it do
something. I don't recommend you buy any drugs from unknown street
dealers.
That is a hard and fast rule we all learned back in the early 70s.
Another way for you to avoid this problem is smoke something that's
been
smoked before. What I mean is if a friend has some grass they've already
tried and it's ok, what's wrong with trying it yourself? In theory,
nobody
would ever sell you something dangerous. In the case you mentioned
the
person was warned. If someone warned me I'd want to know why. What
is
different about this joint. If it's just really strong stuff, I'd be
real
happy to smoke it. If it's been adulterated, I'd want to know with
what,
and I'd probably avoid it.
This reminds me of the old Paraquat scare back in the 70's. Rumors went
around that the marijuana coming from Mexico was sprayed with paraquat,
a
defoliant made from dioxins which are linked to cancer. Everyone got
so
paranoid about it, people actually stopped smoking. This coincided
with the
health craze. Of course it was just the foes of decriminilization that
spread these rumors and then succeeded in getting marijuana laws tightened
again. If you just think about it, if the pot had been sprayed, it
certainly would have looked different, smelled different, and likely
wouldn't have been harvested in the first place since it would have
been
defoliated!!!
Another sure fire way to know what you're smoking is to make friends
with
someone who grows the stuff. Then you know what you're getting. Many
people grow their own, too. Of course we don't recommend you break
the law
wherever you live. You really need to confront your fear as that is
the
mind killer. If we live in fear we really aren't living!
Good luck!
The Old Hippy
I was just wondering if you think
it is possible to accomplish a
neo-hippy movement as great and as intense as
the summer of love? Is
there anyway that you can see the hippies of
this generation molding
together to unleash the essence of flower power
all over again. If so,
enlighten us.
Jazzerous and Jannyfire
A lot has happened since the summer of love in 1967. Unfortunately,
we can
never go back to those days. There was a certain innocence with
which we
entered that year of great change. Today that innocence no longer
exists -
especially now that children are afraid of what might happen in their
own
schools.
The combination of events that flowed into the summer of '67 are unlikely
to
be repeated again. A postwar generation coming of age, draft
age kids going
to a new war far away in Asia, the spiritually hollow affluence of
the most
powerful nation on earth (worse now), the sudden mass production of
a new psychedelic
drug, LSD, the opening up of several million minds to infinite
possibilities, the colorful emergence of a new subculture - hippies,
the
words and music of a generation ready for change, the positive attitudes
and
vibes and feeling of brotherhood, the growing awareness of eastern
philosophies completely at odds with the American consumerist mentality.
All this, combined with our youthful optimism contributed to a feeling
that
we were the future, that we were going to completely change society
into a
hippie utopia. Of course we were naive. Naive about our
own limitations,
about the power structure of society, about how to organize ourselves.
And
then we were all on our own trips, too. The drug scene took many
of our
icons. We learned the futility of fighting the system.
Those that did
ended up in jail or underground or dead. There never was a cohesive
strategy. Even though it was "them" vs. "us", we could never
get "us" to
agree.
However, the lasting impact of the summer of love and the flower people
has
been more subtle. The memes (concepts) we promoted spread around
the world
and have instilled themselves in the subconscious of the species.
These are
reflected in some of the famous sayings of the time:
"Make Love, Not War"
"Peace Now"
"Save the Planet"
"No Nukes!"
and many more.
The point is the collective unconsciousness of our species is still
absorbing and processing this information. It creates a lot of
cognitive
dissonance among us. That is, we now "Question Authority" far
more often,
we don't believe everything we hear, we think for ourselves, and we
have
more of a conscience about what we do.
It is this conscience that seems to have jumped a generation and now
appears
in young (neo) hippies. The sad fact is that the world situation
really hasn't
changed much. The same power structure exists. The need
to respond to the
world situation is as great as ever. In fact this is what has
evolved over
the last three decades. The media has shown us that the problems
of our
planet are far more serious and long term than those of our neighborhood.
Our consciousness has expanded to where we now worry about people we've
never met in countries we've never been to. This sensitivity
is something
new to our species. It belies the "us" and "them" notion with
which our
governments like to brainwash us. THERE IS ONLY "US"!
THIS IS OUR PLANET!
What we do will determine the future of the human race. If we
let hate and
fear rule the world, we are in for a catastrophic millenium.
It is YOUR
GENERATION, the new hippies who must spread the word about LOVE
and PEACE
and the alternatives open to us. Those who hate and fear see
nothing but
hate and fear around them. We must open their eyes as time is
running out
for us.
I can see a new movement emerging if we have a single uniting cause.
I once
thought the marijuana movement might do it, but the $18 billion being
spent
on the war on drugs is hard to counter. I think what might do
it is if
there is a draft to fight the war in Kosovo. Then I think this
draft age
group of 17-19 year olds will finally open their mouths before being
sent to
die in some distant land just to help some aging military industrial
societies save face by destroying another military industrial society
ruled
by a megalomanic.
One thing we have on our side now, which didn't exist in the '60s (in
it's
present form) is the Internet! Our ability to organize and communicate
is
greatly enhanced, and once we coordinate our efforts we can become
a truly
effective force in this society. Hippyland is here to help facilitate
this
goal, as are many other websites. We await the cause, we await
your call.
Peace,
The Old Hippy
The
Kosovo Question
i recently
heard that they are sending ground troops to kosovo. i
was told that they are most likely going to start
a draft. i am 19
years old and am worried about being drafted.
i think it is terrible
what is happening over there but feel that killing
is not the
answer. i am strongly against fighting and would
do anything to not
go if i was drafted. there are surely better
ways to go about
helping other than killing. what i am wondering
is do you have any
suggestions on how to dodge the draft and what
the consequences of me
doing so would be. also, even if it doesn't come
down to a draft, are
there ways i can help to remedy the situation
that do not support the
war? and lastly, where do you stand on this issue?
do you feel
there are other ways to go about this other than
fighting and
killing? is there a point where i should suspend
my beliefs toward
war and killing in order to fight for the lives
of others? i feel
like my beliefs are opposing each other on this
issue. on one side i
hold the belief that all killing is bad, war
is evil and that
peace is the solution to everything, and on the
other i believe that
it is everyone's duty to help others in need.
if the only way to help
the muslims in kosovo is war, i am confused.
i do not know what is
more important. helping others or having peace.
could it be
possible that the only way to create peace between
the serbs and the
muslims is war? i hope not but it is certainly
a possibility,
right?
as against war as i am, i sometimes
feel it could be a good thing. and while i cannot
justify killing
other humans simply because they hold different
beliefs, in the long
run, could it be possible that war is helping
to prolong the
existence of the human race?
i will attempt to explain what i mean.
in all animals other than humans there are certain
limitations set
upon the species which limit the size of the
population. these
include but are not limited to disease, fighting
and killing due to
competition or need for food, and the size of
the animals habitat.
when one elk kills another when competing to
win the right to mate
with a certain female, or when a heard of caribou
leave a sick member
to die or be eaten by wolves we say "oh that
is sad, but no big deal,
it is natures way." but as humans we have found
ways to cure
diseases that should kill large amounts of people
and we have created
special programs to help those individuals who
are not able to
survive on their own. we have developed medicines
and diets that
allow us to survive many years longer than was
ever possible. all of
these "developments" ultimately increase the
number of humans on
this earth and there is only so much room for
us to grow. we are
already destroying the habitat of other animals
so that we may
continue to expand. i feel that inevitably the
earth will be unable
to support us any longer and something will happen
to extinguish our
existence. or at least cut our population by
a huge proportion such
as the bubonic plague did. perhaps war is the
last natural way to
control our population? maybe peace (at least
when thought of as
stopping war) is more harmful to everyone than
war itself? these are
all questions with which i struggle and was just
wondering if you
have any insight which could shed a light on
my confusion.
one last thought. . . peace is a wonderful goal
to work toward but everyone's
definition of this should not simply mean 'no
war.' it is much more
important to be at peace with our individual
selves and with the
natural world than to end war. we have committed
far greater crimes
to our mother earth and our brother and sister
animals than we do
when we kill each other. at least in war the
two sides know what
they are getting into and have an understanding
for what is going on
and for the consequences. And to the Old Hippy,
thank you for your
time. I am sure everyone who writes to you is
as appreciative as
myself that there is someone out there to listen
to our questions and
provide guidance when we need it most.
Wow, what difficult questions! You’ve obviously thought this out.
I wish more of us would think things through before we open our mouths.
I’ll try to answer these deep questions.
First concerning the draft and how to dodge it. Thankfully, there
isn’t one now and hopefully it won’t be necessary to force people against
their will to travel long distances to kill people they don’t even know,
or get killed themselves. I wasn’t a draft dodger myself as I was
in a lottery and got a lucky number, over 300. Even though I was
in school I would’ve been drafted if my number was lower. There really
was no escape from the Vietnam era draft in the early years, except to
flee the country. Many of our boys went to Canada. I suppose
many of them still live there!
Since the draft was stopped, I believe it will take an act of Congress
to restore it. One can only hope that should they resort to that
desperate measure they’ll use some common sense and not force people to
serve against their will and conscience. I know the armed services
have had trouble in the last few years filling their quotas. This
could mean that they are understaffed for a prolonged conflict on a wide
scale. So this IS A POSSIBILITY!
It’s good that people are concerned about this because it can happen pretty
fast. One day you’re graduating high school looking forward to college
and your future when a draft notice arrives and suddenly your future becomes
much less certain.
I hope that in the event of another draft, everyone will get out and
protest! Don’t wait until YOUR NUMBER IS
UP! I believe if you feel it’s your duty to defend “your
country” against Serbian aggression, then, hey, go for it. It’s your
life. But if you don’t believe that killing others is the solution,
then you must say it and SAY IT LOUD!
Now as far as other ways to help the situation. There is always
a need for volunteers to help get aid to the real victims of war.
Everything from picking up donations to delivering them in the field requires
much time and energy. I’m sure there are agencies in your area that
are helping out the refugees. In any war there are many ways to assist,
and many ways to protest. As we are seeing, much of the war is fought
with propaganda, with each side trying to convince the public that they
are right. That is also how you protest. You organize, you go out
in public, you provide information, and you make your feelings known! You
march on picket lines, you sign petitions, you write your congressmen,
you boycott, you rally, you get your friends to help. That’s what
it’s all about, that’s what it takes to sway public opinion and the political
powers that be. We’ve done it before, we can do it again.
As far as the situation in Kosovo is concerned, it is a real mess.
At this time we are hearing reports of innocent Kosovo civilians being
killed by an air attack on a convoy. This is the tragedy of war.
The people who make war, whether they sit in the Pentagon or in some Palace
in Bagdad or Belgrade are immune from it’s effects. Our government
respects the rights of dictators and mass murderers far more than the innocent
people smashed by the war machine. All in the name of sovereignty.
Makes you wonder just how much they’ll care about YOU
when YOUR NUMBER IS UP, eh?
It took the destruction of Europe to finally get to Hitler. Do
you think it will take any less to get to Milosovich? Do you think
he would stand down? His power in Yugoslavia is absolute, and so
he is absolutely corrupted. Does this mean he would sooner see the
destruction of his country and the death of all his countrymen before he
would surrender? Let’s hope we don’t have to find out!
So this leaves us with a moral dilemma of global proportions.
What have we learned since WWII and Vietnam that can help us with this
situation? During the beginning of WWII the U.S. sat on the sidelines
being neutral, not wanting to get involved. In the meantime, Hitler’s
troops rolled over one country after another, inventing more efficient
methods of “ethnic cleansing” along the way. Eventually it got to
the point where the U.S. finally felt threatened by the situation.
If we had acted earlier, how many MILLIONS
of lives would have been saved?
In Vietnam, our government viewed the situation through the lens of
the “domino theory” believing that once Vietnam became totally communist,
the rest of Asia and the Pacific would follow, in a similar fashion to
Eastern Europe. Remember communism was at its peak in the 60s!
In this case with Serbia, it’s not an issue of ideology or economic theory.
It’s a clear case of ethnic and religious rivalry and greed. In my
opinion this irrational hatred is the most serious issue facing the world
on the eve of a new millennia.
But these issues are human issues and have been present since man first
killed man. According to Eastern philosophy, the individuals involved,
whether they have the power to declare war or are the first innocent victims,
are fulfilling their karma. To judge these people and their actions
in any way draws you into their karmic energy. If the world is a
giant stage where we act our parts in some life or death drama then we
must choose our role carefully. For we are doomed to act the part
over and over again until we get it right. To get it right means
that we treat others with love and respect, thereby freeing ourselves from
the karmic burden and the cycle of reincarnation.
So to answer the last questions you posed, war is not a solution that
automatically brings peace. Yet peace always comes when the war ends!
Taking sides in a war means that you are now involved karmically.
Calling for peace and helping your fellow man is the path of love and will
bring about the best results.
By asking these questions, I can see you are on the right path.
Your observations about man and the larger ecosystem reveal your insight
into what lies behind Maya, the illusion. The natural forces at work are
far beyond man’s comprehension. They have provided us with a luxurious
garden that provides far more than we need. We will eventually pay
for our lack of respect for this garden, and this time we might be exiled
permanently. If the planetary choice is between our species and the
health of the planet, I wouldn’t bet against mother nature finding a way
to “cleanse the human disease”. By respecting your fellow man, regardless
of his karmic situation, you improve life on the planet. Indeed,
showing this respect for all life and the planet itself is the only way
we can make it through the next millennium.
-The Old Hippy
To
view previous questions and answers click here!
|